In a historic ruling by Minnesota judge, cameras allowed in courtroom for officers’ trial in death of George Floyd

In a historic ruling by Minnesota judge, cameras allowed in courtroom for officers’ trial in death of George Floyd

The trial of four former Minneapolis police officers charged in the death of George Floyd will be livestreamed because of a judge’s historic order Thursday allowing cameras and audio in the Minneapolis courtroom for the March 2021 trial.

Citing immense global interest in the case, limited courthouse space and restricted public movements because of the COVID-19 pandemic, Judge Peter Cahill said the “only way to vindicate the defendants’ constitutional right to a public trial and the media’s and public’s constitutional rights of access to criminal trials is to allow audio and video coverage of the trial.”

The live broadcast of a high-profile trial in a Minnesota state court is without precedent and the decision was greeted with enthusiasm by the media and First Amendment lawyers who say it is both welcome and overdue. While audio has been available in some Minnesota appellate courts and some sentencings may be filmed if a judge approves, cameras are rarely allowed even though many other states have permitted them for decades.

Cahill’s ruling noted that this case is an extremely high-profile trial occurring at an exceptionally historic time because of the ongoing global pandemic.

Defense lawyers for the charged former officers already are on board. Attorneys for Derek Chauvin, J. Alexander Kueng, Thomas Lane and Tou Thao filed a joint motion in June requesting camera access at all pretrial hearings and at the trial or trials.

But Attorney General Keith Ellison, who is overseeing prosecution, opposed the motion. Typically, Minnesota rules allow trials to be broadcast only if all the parties agreed.

READ MORE  About 2.6% of Minnesota residents have received COVID-19 vaccine

A spokesman for Ellison said only that he is “evaluating” Cahill’s ruling. He has the option to appeal.

Cahill grounded his ruling in the U.S. Constitution, citing the First Amendment guarantee of press and public access to trials as well as the Sixth Amendment guarantee to defendants that the public may see they are “fairly dealt with and not unjustly condemned.”

Under normal circumstances, spectators can come and go from courtrooms as they please, but these are not normal times, the order said. Social distancing requirements due to the pandemic already tightly restrict the number of people who can be in courtrooms.

Even though a special courtroom has been configured in Hennepin County for this trial, spacing constraints will allow little — “if any” — room for spectators. “That includes not only family members and friends of George Floyd and the defendants, but also members of the public and the press,” he wrote.

During a recent hearing on the case, Cahill noted that a limited number of media were allowed to watch the proceedings in a separate courtroom from a live feed via a static, fixed camera.

In a separate order Thursday, Cahill ordered the four defendants to stand trial together, requiring four socially distanced defense tables for the men and their lawyers. The judge said interest in the case will continue to outstrip the court’s ability to provide access to the trial in the courthouse.

Cahill acknowledged that his ruling went farther in providing access than outlined in the Minnesota rules, but he said absent the accommodations the public would be left with nothing but the arguments of the lawyers. “That is hardly the basis for the public to participate in and serve as a check upon the judicial process,” he wrote.

READ MORE  Lennon's legacy lives on through rural St. Cloud animal sanctuary

Mitchell Hamline School of Law Professor Raleigh Levine said, “This ruling is not only unusual for Minnesota but it goes farther than the U.S. Supreme Court has gone in interpreting the very broad right to public access.”

Levine noted that the order is carefully written to address this particular case in these unusual times, not to create a blanket permission of cameras.

“Given the intense feelings that the murder has generated, I think it makes a lot of sense to say we can avoid a lot of angst, we can possibly even avoid protests if people can see what’s going on in the courthouse and reassure themselves as to the fair administration of the trial by the judge,” Levine said.

Defense lawyer Earl Gray, who represents Lane, has tried many cases in Wisconsin where cameras are allowed.

“It doesn’t interfere with anybody’s procedures in the courtroom,” Gray said. “We never show the jury. They’re never on TV. It’s just the witnesses, the judge and the lawyer. I thought that’s way overdue.”

The decision was well received by those who have long advocated for greater transparency in Minnesota courtrooms.

“I’m thrilled,” said Jane Kirtley, a lawyer, professor and director of the Silha Center for Media Ethics and the Law at the University of Minnesota. “This is the kind of memorandum I’m going to give my students to say, ‘This is what a judge should say about cameras in the courtroom.’ ”

READ MORE  Bygones: 100 years ago, Duluth held Christmas party at the Armory | Duluth News Tribune

Suki Dardarian, Star Tribune managing editor, called the decision historic on many fronts.

“Minnesota’s rules on cameras in the courtroom are among the most restrictive in the county, so we are extremely gratified that the court determined that both the defendants’ right to a fair, public trial and the media’s right of access can be met by providing live coverage,” she said.

Both Kirtley and Dardarian are veterans of the fight for access to proceedings in another Hennepin County trial — the 2019 conviction of former Minneapolis police officer Mohammed Noor in the death of Justine Ruszczyk Damond.

Because of restrictive rulings by Hennepin County Judge Kathryn Quaintance in that case, a media coalition was formed to fight for access to evidence, including body camera video from the night Damond was killed. Earlier this year, the coalition successfully fought for the release of body-camera videos recorded by police officers the night George Floyd was killed, which were filed into evidence by their attorneys.

Now, there’s hope that Cahill’s order will be catalytic beyond the Floyd trial, opening courtrooms to cameras in future trials. “If this goes well, we’ll have an example of here’s a case that had all these challenges and everybody’s constitutional rights were protected,” Kirtley said.

Staff Writer Chao Xiong contributed to this report.

@rochelleolson

rn{% endblock %}"},"start":"https://users.startribune.com/placement/1/environment/3/limit-signup-optimizely/start"},{"id":"limit-signup","count":12,"action":"ignore","mute":true,"action_config":{"template":"{% extends "grid" %}rnrn{% block heading_text %}Youu2019ve read your 10 free articles for this 30 day period. Sign up now for local coverage you wonu2019t find anywhere else, special sections and your favorite columnists. StarTribune puts Minnesota and the world right at your fingertips. {% endblock %}rnrn{% block last %}rn{{ parent() }}rn{# limit Krux pixel from https://www.squishlist.com/strib/customshop/328/ #}rnrnrn{% endblock %}"},"start":"https://users.startribune.com/placement/1/environment/3/limit-signup/start"},{"id":"meter-desktop-331","count":10,"action":"ignore","mute":false,"action_config":false,"start":"https://users.startribune.com/placement/1/environment/3/meter-desktop-331/start"},{"id":"PDA991499opt","count":9,"action":"ignore","mute":true,"action_config":false,"start":"https://users.startribune.com/placement/1/environment/3/PDA991499opt/start"},{"id":"limit","count":8,"action":"inject","mute":false,"action_config":{"template":"

rnrnrnrn

rn

rn

rn rn

rn t

rn SUBSCRIBErn Already a subscriber? Log in.rn

rn

All Star Tribune readers without a Digital Access subscription are given a limited number of complimentary articles every 30 days. Once the article limit is reached we ask readers to purchase a subscription including Digital Access to continue reading. Digital Access is included in all multi-day paper home delivery, Sunday + Digital, and Premium Digital Access subscriptions. After the 1 month Premium Digital Access introductory period you will be charged at a rate of $14.99 per month. You can see all subscription options or login to an existing subscription herern

rn rn

rn

rn

rn

rn

rn"},"start":"https://users.startribune.com/placement/1/environment/3/limit/start"},{"id":"nag","count":7,"action":"lightbox","mute":true,"action_config":{"height":null,"width":"630px","redirect_on_close":null,"template":"{% extends "shell" %}rnrn{% block substyles %}rn

rn{% endblock %}rnrn{% block page %}rn{#rnrn{{ limit - count - 1 }}rnrn{{ form.flow_form_open({nextAction: 'firstSlide'}, null, null, '_top') }}rn {{ form.btn('Save Now') }}rn{{ form.flow_form_close() }}rnrn

rnrnrnu2022 rnrnrnrn#}rn

rn

rn

You have {{ limit - count - 1 }} articles left

rn

rn rn u00a0u00a0u2022u00a0u00a0rn rn

rn

rn

rn

rn Save More Todayrn

Over 70% off!

rn

rn

rn

rn

99u00a2 for first 4 weeks

rn {{ form.flow_form_open({nextAction: 'firstSlide'}, null, null, '_top') }}rn {{ form.button('Save Now', 'btn nag-btn') }}rn {{ form.flow_form_close() }}rn

rn

rn{% endblock %}rnrn{% block last %}rn{{ parent() }}rnrn{% endblock %}"},"start":"https://users.startribune.com/placement/1/environment/3/nag/start"},{"id":"x","count":4,"action":"ignore","mute":true,"action_config":false,"start":"https://users.startribune.com/placement/1/environment/3/x/start"},{"id":"multi-start","count":3,"action":"fly_in","mute":true,"action_config":{"location":"bottom_left","slide_direction":"bottom","group_id":null,"display_delay":"0","collapse_delay":"10","template":"

rn

rn

rn

rn u00d7rn

rn

rn

From just

rn

$3.79 99u00a2 a week

rn Save nowrn

rn

rn

"},"start":"https://users.startribune.com/placement/1/environment/3/multi-start/start"}]};

Source link

Be the first to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


*