Empty shops an opportunity for creative revival, but planning is key

Even this was regarded by temporary users as a corruption of the original concept, which was about taking control of space and showing how alternative land uses could engage people and enliven the ‘hood, free of exchange and financialisation.


In Australia, temporary use has somehow distorted into “area activation”, where users are not only recruited into a strategy explicitly intended to raise property values – which will mean they are evicted if the place can be profitably relet – but are asked to pay for the privilege.

The marketing of the temporary “pop-up” use as some edgy urban hack completely evacuates the concept of its political intent – no self-respecting punk would be caught dead entering into a lease agreement that requires them to pay rent for a temporary use and commits them to leaving at the owner’s whim.

More important are the implications of the commodification of temporary use for live-work spaces. While such uses in Europe generally have no time limit – meaning there is always the prospect of being moved on – controls on evictions mean they can continue for years.

READ MORE  'Caught in moment' no excuse: Police promise action against rowdy AFL fans

The vast majority of cultural and social enterprises need stability for planning and production. For any kind of housing, security of tenure is fundamental to maintaining social relationships, proper healthcare and an ongoing income.


Before ideas of turning empty offices into temporary housing and shops into short-term arts spaces gain too much traction, we should look at how these might be made suitably long-term for their prospective inhabitants. There needs to be a way of ensuring secure, affordable rental contracts with building owners, which will require mediation and probably subsidies from local authorities, if not outright purchase.

There are still too many state and locally managed public buildings sitting empty. A key element to releasing and repurposing vacant buildings or parts of buildings is to get the planning and building controls right. This is a state responsibility. Changes of use from office to residential, shop to studio, or warehouse to music venue need to be facilitated in planning schemes. Building regulations have to be tailored to relieve such changes from unnecessary and expensive compliance conditions.

READ MORE  Watching the detectives: an amazing job with a price to pay

Those responsible for planning Melbourne finally seem to recognise the great contribution made by the city’s diverse array of social, arts and cultural enterprises. For the past two decades, start-ups, studios and venues have struggled against increasing rents, threats of closure from encroaching residents, unnecessary planning categorisations and prohibitive building standards.

These activities can no longer be consigned to planning afterthoughts or after-dinner entertainment for the comfortable classes. They have a vital role in reinvigorating Victoria’s economy, and should be put front and centre in strategies to attract visitors again to the state, city and regional centres.

None of this should preclude the possibility of genuine temporary uses, of course. Land and buildings left vacant for no good reason should be squatted. In some European cities contracts can be drawn up between absentee owners and users that allow the users to stay rent-free on the basis that they maintain and even improve the structures. In cases where the city is the owner, squats are often effectively legalised.

READ MORE  'Breathtaking incompetence': Health Workers Union calls for Premier to sack Health Minister

All these things happen in Berlin because the people have made it so.

In Melbourne, now, this thinking has a basis not only in equity, but in economic recovery.

Dr Kate Shaw is an urban geographer at the University of Melbourne.

Most Viewed in National



Source link

Be the first to comment

Leave a Reply